Aaron Donnelly

Directory, Complexus Limited

Are you attending Critical Communications World 2024?

Yes

Please tell us your job function?

Advisor Analyst Chairpersons Chief Executive Consultant Designer Director Distributor/Reseller Engineers Managing Director Network Operator Services Supplier Software/SaaS provider Supervisor Technician

What sectors do you work in?

Airport Ambulance Bus/Tram Coastguard Defence Energy Engineering/Construction Events Facilities management Fire Logistics Manufacturing Mining Mountain rescue Municipalities/Government Oil and Gas Other Police Ports Retail complexes Roads Security Water/Sewage

What are your areas of interest?

Antennas Artificial Intelligence Asset management Audio accessories Body worn video cameras Cloud computing Command & control Components Coverage testing Cyber security Data & Intelligence DMR applications DMR radios Drones/UAVs Facial recognition Geo-spatial planning and mapping Hybrid devices ICT In-building coverage Internet of Things/Safe cities Mission critical broadband devices Mission critical broadband network Network Services – Broadband Network Services – Narrowband Ruggedized devices Satellite communications Smart emergency services solutions Test equipment & services TETRA applications TETRA Infrastructure Products TETRA radios Virtual reality/augmented reality

Influencer Of

Recent Conversations

Recent Comments

Apr 13, 2023

As per when I was the performance and security test assurance authority on this programme, an issue still remains in the form of no clear end to end ownership of the overall technical solution.

Lack of centrally driven (architected) design processes facilitate suppliers to narrow focus on their elements only, rather than taking a wider view of an end-to-end solution and its interactions with other suppliers’ elements.  This results in the assurance function outputs being ignored / overridden and collaborative working between suppliers accepted by middle management as too difficult to achieve right now.  So, a stalemate situation arises leaving technical misalignment and gaps.  Leadership is then blind to the truth, assurance functions are deemed to be providing no little to no value and suppliers get away with raising a continuous stream of contract variations, in an attempt to align the technical direction, but still in partial isolation and favourable to them, rather than the wider programme.

An example / food for thought, who owns the security of digital forensic data?  For example, photographs stored on the SD card of an end user device.

The solution is as @Peter Clemons has said many times before, you need at least a central technical authority to provide architectural design governance / oversight.  Diversifying the supply chain to avoid a monopoly makes sense, until you try to hold them to account on elements that overlap.  Now whether you issue the entire delivery to a single supplier / consortium or enhance the home office central technical governance is a question I would love to begin a debate on.  Personally, I would prefer the later as it was almost there before.